(5) When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.

Contains all Enforced Central and State Acts linked with Subordinate Data like Rules,Regulations,Notifications,Orders,Circulars,Ordinances,Statutes.

भारतीय न्याय संहिता (BNS) की धारा 318 धोखाधड़ी (Cheating) को परिभाषित करती है। इस धारा के तहत, जब कोई व्यक्ति किसी को धोखा देकर, झूठी जानकारी देकर ...

भारतीय न्याय संहिता की धारा 61 आपराधिक षड्यंत्र (Criminal Conspiracy) के अपराध से संबंधित है। इसमें दो या दो से अधिक लोगों के बीच किसी अवैध कार्य या ...

3. We have considered the materials on record. Allegations in the FIR disclose petitioners had purchased land and had made part payment. In view of nature of allegations we are of the opinion dispute is essentially civil in nature. Hence, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.

In view of the discussion made herein above, this Court feels that the allegations in the FIR contain essential ingredients of offenses under Sections 318 and 316 of BNS.

What is the difference between BNS S.336 (forgery), S.338 (forgery of valuable security), and S.336 (3) (forgery for cheating)? These three forgery provisions form a hierarchy: S.336 (basic forgery) covers any false document made with fraudulent intent — punishment up to 2 years.

भारतीय न्याय संहिता (BNS) में इन दोनों अपराधों को अलग-अलग परिभाषित किया गया है: धारा 318 — Cheating (धोखाधड़ी) धारा 316 — Criminal Breach of Trust (अमानत में खयानत)

Recently, Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan clarified that cheating (S.420 IPC/S.318 BNS) and criminal breach of trust (S.405 IPC/S.316 BNS) cannot be alleged together on the same facts, as they are “antithetical.”

Read the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 with section-wise provisions, offences, punishments, key IPC differences, explanations, and PDF download in English and Hindi.